Confronting Amyraldianism!

First of all, I'd like to talk a little bit about what Amyraldians believe first off. We shall take a look and see for ourselves, "This view maintains that Christ died for all men alike, making all men savable, with actual salvation conditioned on individual faith. Then God, seeing that no one would respond because of their depravity, chose (or elected) some to receive the grace to believe. Some see this as inconsistent, for how is it possible to contend that God gave His Son to die for all men alike and equally, and at the same time to declare that when He gave His Son to die, He already fully intended that His death should not avail for all men equally, but only for some which He would select." The question I wanna ask the amyraldians if God gave his son to die for all men then why are all men not saved? It absolutely makes no sense that Christ would die for those who would burn in hell. That would presuppose, that Christ atonement was done in vain since his atonement would do them no avail, even though Christ had died for them the whole notion is absurd. Amyraldianism is as absurd and is wholly inconsistent with the theology of reformed Christianity it is wholly unorthodox in it's understanding of the atonement, or justification.

PS I'm going to show you how they purposely, misinterpret what Calvin said in his writings you guys will be amazed.